Contribute  :  Advanced Search  :  Site Statistics  :  Directory  :  aboutus  :  donate  :  editorial  :  getpublished  :  moderation  :  Links  :  Polls  :  Calendar  
Infoshop News Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth
Welcome to Infoshop News, s
Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 03:22 AM CDT
   

Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair

Lib TechThe New York City tabloids wouldn’t know what to make of the Anarchist Bookfair, which happened this past spring. If the Post attended, its reporters would probably have been disappointed that there was no sign of bicycle bombers. The Daily News would have been shocked that nobody plotted mass destruction for the next political convention. These anarchists were mostly interested in reading books, attending lectures, and sometimes networking with activists involved in nonviolent dissent. Unfortunately, everybody knows that harmony and civic involvement make bland newspaper copy.

Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
By Adam Klasfeld

The New York City tabloids wouldn’t know what to make of the Anarchist Bookfair, which happened this past spring. If the Post attended, its reporters would probably have been disappointed that there was no sign of bicycle bombers. The Daily News would have been shocked that nobody plotted mass destruction for the next political convention. These anarchists were mostly interested in reading books, attending lectures, and sometimes networking with activists involved in nonviolent dissent. Unfortunately, everybody knows that harmony and civic involvement make bland newspaper copy.

But there was still hope for hell-raising because a group called The Bad Egg Collective planned to stage a protest. They argued that the event betrayed the ideals of anarchism because the vendors sold their books for profit; the lectures created a hierarchy between the speaker and the spectator; and the format encouraged consumption over creativity. In short, the Anarchist Bookfair was insufficiently anarchic. To express his dissent, the leader of this group planned to bring a photocopier and pass out flyers. This was something that I could scoop the tabloids on: anarchist in-fighting.

As I approached the book fair at Judson Memorial Church, friendly Trotskyites passed out pamphlets from the Partisan Defense Committee and Workers Vanguard about the fight to free Mumia Abu-Jamal from death row. One woman invited me to participate in the upcoming protest in Philadelphia. While I sympathized with the cause of a man who was framed for shooting a cop, the demonstration was planned for the first night of Passover, and I already had plans to attend my family’s Seder. Between my religious and familial loyalties, I found out early on that I would make a poor radical activist. I picked up some newsletters and made a modest donation instead.

I entered the main hall where over forty vendors were proudly hawking subversive literature, but the protest was nowhere in sight. Eventually, I found it on a corner, where there was a strange handmade wooden structure with a red cardboard sign that had “COPY BOOKS HERE!” badly stenciled in black magic marker. It looked like a lemonade stand from a left-wing Peanuts comic strip, but the contraption was more sophisticated than it appeared. The wood was hand-cut with a rotary saw, and it held a digital camera pointed at a pane of glass that enclosed a book. The copier worked by photographing the pages one by one and sending the images to a laptop computer.

Its inventor Andrew Cady estimated that he only paid about $15 for the materials. He bought the wood, glass, and hinges at Home Depot, and he already owned the electronic equipment. His friend Steve, who was standing next to him, managed to program the software that made it function while stoned the morning of the event. It took about a week to conceptualize and build the machine, and it stood before the room as a work of shabby ingenuity.

(Andrew later told me that an inventor from Japan made one out of LEGO bricks. You have to admire Japanese craftsmanship.)

In any event, one man was so impressed with Andrew’s invention that he handed them his business card to shoot ideas off each other about spreading the technology. I never expected the protest to have such a warm reception. For hours, the two of them had taken books they wanted to read from vendors and digitized them onto CD-ROMs, and not once did anyone try to stop them. Instead, they got free books and a potential business opportunity.

Something had to be done. I thought that maybe the vendors never noticed the books being taken, and I offered to ask each vendor to photocopy one of their books to see how they responded. My first stop was the stand of the publishing house Seven Stories Press, where I picked up the collection of repressed journalism Censored 2008.

“Excuse me. Do you mind if I photocopy this book at that table at the corner?” I asked an attractive twenty-something who was manning the booth.


“Sure,” she replied, as if I just asked her to borrow a pen. “We don’t mind if it’s you guys doing it.”

I later found out that Seven Stories Press has four separate offices across three countries. Its New York branch is located in Tribeca, one of New York’s most expensive neighborhoods. I was beginning to see Andy’s point about anarchist-industrial-complex. Keeping up radical bona-fides can be a matter of sound business policy. In any event, I loved this particular journalism anthology, and I owned it on disc after about five minutes of photographing the pages. I thanked her when I gave it back, and she thanked me for returning it. She might have thought I would pull an Abbie Hoffman.

The next table was run by an anarchist collective called “A New World in Our Hearts” that runs direct action campaigns like urban gardening and food aid throughout Brooklyn. It had a book about Mumia called Dead Blossoms that got me intrigued, and they also had no problem with my asking to copy it. Still, it was one thing not to pay an international publishing house for a book and another to do the same thing with a charitable activist collective. I offered them a donation when I returned it.

At Autonomedia’s table, I picked up the book The Art of Free Cooperation, which appealed to my sense of irony. Again, the vendor had no problem when I asked to digitize the book, and she added, “We’re anti-copyright. It would be ridiculous of us to refuse you.” Everyone so far smiled as I calmly explained that I wanted to take the goods they were selling.

Of the vendors, only the saleswoman at AK Press looked even mildly annoyed by my request, but she grudgingly let me take the book Introduction to Anarchism. It was a small soft-cover that was difficult not to bend while photocopying, and I tried my best not to damage it under the glass. “Don’t worry,” urged Steve from behind the machine. “It’s already dead.” I figured that I was probably too polite to be a proper anarchist, and I brought the book back in more or less the same condition in which I found it.

Concerned that this anarchist melee was not turning out according to plan, I decided to take matters into my own hands. “Photocopy your books here!” I belted out like a sideshow barker across the room, hoping that would cause more of a stir. Nobody took offense or even responded, except for one girl who was interested in the offer.

“Was that obnoxious?” I asked Andrew.

“Yes, it was.”

“I guess that’s part of the role of the journalist – to be obnoxious,” I rationalized.

“That’s an unhappy way of looking at your profession,” Andrew philosophized.

Maybe he was right. I decided to take it easy for the rest of the demonstration. I looked for more free books at Red Emma’s Bookstore, which was visiting from Baltimore, but by then, the line for the machine had gotten too long. I decided to quit while I was ahead, and I helped Andrew pass out fliers agitating against profit-making from radical literature.

“Isn’t this crossing the line of my journalistic objectivity?” I worried.

“Don’t worry,” he said. “It’s gonzo.”

To celebrate their work, his friend planned to buy falafels, and they got an extra one for me. I came into the event hoping to cover revolution, but I was happy settling for CD-ROM books, new story ideas, and dinner.

As I was about to leave, one young woman looked appalled about the stand. “Won’t that machine bend the covers?” she complained, and the organizers of the protest shrugged. She explained that it bothered her because she worked at the radical Lower East Side bookstore Bluestockings.

“That’s where we’re going next,” Andrew said defiantly.

She looked upset and angry before she quietly walked away. That was about as heated as the protest got.

To further discussion, a mailing list has been set up at https://lists.riseup.net/www/info/samizdat

http://www.thelmagazine.com/6/18/Film/feature6.cfm?ctype=2

Trackback

Trackback URL for this entry: http://news.infoshop.org/trackback.php?id=20081007032009457

No trackback comments for this entry.
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair | 26 comments | s Logout
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
A link to the pamphlet
Authored by: s on Tuesday, October 07 2008 @ 03:01 PM CDT
Here is the pamphlet that was passed out: http://jerkface.net/anarchist-bookfair
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: mokey on Tuesday, October 07 2008 @ 09:09 PM CDT
I don't really get it. Of course anarchists would let you copy their books. If the point is to spread the information, then where can I grab the files? It seems more like you're just trying to be a smartass.
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 02:26 AM CDT
try gigapedia.org
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: Admin on Tuesday, October 07 2008 @ 09:19 PM CDT

"They argued that the event betrayed the ideals of anarchism because the vendors sold their books for profit..."

What an incredibly ignorant, idiotic statement. Anarchists do not make a profit from selling books, in fact, even non-anarchist small presses are break-even or money-losing projects. This statement ignorantly conflates the selling of books with making a profit from selling books. If selling anarchist books were profitable, then you'd see more commercial publishers publishing anarchist books. The fact is that most, if not all, anarchist publishing projects are break-even or money-losing. Even AK Press is probably just barely breaking even after they pay staff and pay the bills for printing books. AK is also very generous when it comes to extending credit to new bookstores and infoshops.

I suspect that most vendors at anarchist bookstores actually lose money after all of the expenses of attending the fair are added up. I've tabled at bookfairs for various publishing projects and the amount of money we made didn't even begin to cover the travel costs involved. If we did make more money than our travel expenses, then we're talking money that would probably go towards paying printing bills.

Printing books is becoming ever more expensive with this economy.

Chuck0

The reporter mischaracterized the critique
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:12 AM CDT
If you read the pamphlet and the advertisement you will see that this reporter's characterization of the criticism is somewhat lacking. The booksellers are not criticized for taking a profit; rather, the content of the books is criticized for its debasement under the constraints of the profit motive.

I quote (bold added): How easily the most well-meaning radical is enticed by the lure of the ethical profession, of the ‘good life within the bad’—that dream of somehow ‘making a living’ in the capitalist economy, by opposing it. A servant can serve only one master: once introduced, the requisition of profit permeates totally any endeavor. Revolutionary writing would eschew all the legal and economic demands of originality, entertainment value, marketability. The book with a purpose is a collage: it borrows without scruples and attributes only when attribution serves a communicative function; it targets its audience not as a market to appease, seeking mass appeal, but rather seeks that minority, however small, of truly receptive listeners—as actors to incite. Every decision of the author—the topic, the structure, the conventions of scholarship and style, the mode of address, the relation of the author to the reader, the decision, even, of whether to write—every written word is infused with this question of purpose. Profit cannot be reconciled with revolution.

The reporter mischaracterized the critique
Authored by: Admin on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:39 AM CDT
Those are pretty words, but they are divorced from reality, even a revolutionary anarchist reality. Anarchist books are not published to make a profit. I know of no anarchist writers who make a living from writing anarchist books, though I would 100% support any anarchist writer who could make a living writing anarchist books. More power to them if they can escape the rat race of capitalism.

Who has ever argued that publishing anarchist books is revolutionary? Anarchist publishers charge money for books to pay for printing costs, staff costs, overhead and the development of new books. How hard is this to understand? Given how fucking hard it is these days to publish radical books, or keep a radical bookstore open, why would any anarchist or radical attack anarchist publishers?

This is just stupid. They aren't your enemies.

I just don't understand this attitude held by some anarchists where it is OK to shit on the work being done by other anarchists. Does this come from the punk movement or from nihilism?

Chuck0
The reporter mischaracterized the critique
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 02:15 AM CDT

An author writes a novel; it is 150 pages. He sends it to the publisher. "Brilliant!" they say. But--they require novels of at least 250 pages. And so they add: "please add another 100 pages."

It doesn't matter who is profiting, who is breaking even, and who is getting deeper in debt. The book that is to be sold is written to be sold.

The majority of the books for sale at that event should not even exist. There is no reason to promote their being read; moreover, they function to hide what should be visible. For the most part, no more than 5 copies of any particular book were available. Any book that might sell is put up for sale, and as many different books as possible: to get the most sales possible, standard retail practices are employed. Yet if any particular book were worth printing at all, and showing before a public, then it would be worthy of more copies than that. 500 copies of one book is better than 1 copy each of 500 books--think about it. And then look at which one you see, and ask why.

The decisions that one makes at one's table, when one is trying to generate income (whether for profit or for sustenance!) are different from the decisions that one makes when one is trying to generate culture. The whole way of thinking is different; it is not a matter of choosing between one thing and another but of totally different ways of acting. In the one case, a particular role--that of retailer--is filled, with more or less competence. In the other, one looks at society, and attempts to make an intervention, attempting to be at once effective and positive--with a better or worse theory of society, more or less fit to the available audience, etc.

The reporter mischaracterized the critique
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 02:23 AM CDT

It's about freedom from exchange

Link to another discussion of this event
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 12:52 AM CDT
This event was also discussed at the forums on anti-politics.net: http://anti-politics.net/archive/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=4617  . A picture of the device is posted there.
Link to another discussion of this event
Authored by: Admin on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:09 AM CDT
The discussion thread contains one lie about Infoshop and myself. The table for Infoshop.org was not turned over to this group. We cancelled our table and the organizers may have allocated it to another group.

I'm not surprised that somebody would make shit up like this. If they support a stupid attack on an anarchist booksfair, then they wouldn't have any qualms about attacking the reputation of a project supported by the international anarchist community.

Chuck
Link to another discussion of this event
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:14 AM CDT
No one participating in that anti-politics forum thread attended the event.
Link to another discussion of this event
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:22 AM CDT
This is what the forum poster actually said: "They just went ... with no plan and/or permission. Apparently Chuck0's big tent of anarchism deflated and they took over the ex-Infoshop table at the event."
Link to another discussion of this event
Authored by: Admin on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:41 AM CDT
There was no ex-infoshop table at the event. This person is lying and making a ridiculous attack on me.

Chuck
Link to another discussion of this event
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:51 AM CDT
The table had a piece of paper taped to it which said "infoshop.org"; the paper was removed and the book-copying station put on the table. That is all that "ex-infoshop table" means. I assure you, nikos is not trying to deceive anyone.
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:03 AM CDT
Here is the text of the Bad Egg Collective listing:

Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair

The Anarchist Bookfair (April 12th, http://anarchistbookfair.net ) claims to be an opportunity to "share your own experience and creativity," yet it reproduces the debilitating social forms of the consumer-capitalist culture industry, forcing a passive role on all so-called participants: the bookfair itself, another commodity-spectacle to reduce us to consumers--providing us another thing to shop for--and the "discussion" panels, where carefully-selected experts inform and entertain the ignorant mass--where everyone sits in a room and stares at one thing, without talking to each other--reducing us again to passive spectators, info-consumers of fixed options placed before us like television channels. Where is the creativity?

I'd like to inject a little--as much as I can--by bringing my book-copying machine and making (and selling at cost) copies of books on CD. I will also be passing out a vaguely pro-situationist/anti-culture industry flyer ( http://jerkface.net/anarchist-bookfair ). I have just acquired free access to a high-speed printer and may be able to print more (e.g., http://bopsecrets.org/SI/6.everyday.htm ).

Ella suggested that this be made into a Bad Egg Collective event. In fact, I see the event is already listed on the calendar. I'll be there all day (unless I get kicked out), but the Bad Egg event will start at 2PM. At 2:30PM there is a presentation I might want to see--you might too--on a squatter's village called Christiania. Stop by and copy some books, pass out propaganda (mine or yours!), stare at the spectacle, shop for new entertainment materials, and indulge me in my delusions of grandeur...

If all goes to plan I'll be beneath a big sign that says COPY BOOKS HERE.

Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: Jaqatharina on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:08 AM CDT
<i>I come every Saturday, sooner or later someone asks, 'How much?' 'Free,' I say. They're stunned, they react as if I'm trying to steal from them. That's capitalism for you. Nothing can be free. The idea makes them sick, they want to call the police, leave mesages for their accountants. They feel unworthy, convinced they've sinned. They have to rush off and buy something just to get their breath back...</i>

All information will be disseminated throughout the cosmos with or without book publishers' consent. The publishers, the authors, and so many other <i>author</i>itarian vectors of congealment are but a bump in the road.

To partake in informational enclosure, to congeal information in the printed form, subject to economic transaction, is to privatize knowledge, a futile attempt.

And if these actions cause any publishers, 'anarchist', or otherwise, to shut down operations, <i>then so much the better.</i>

In solidarity,
Jaqatharina Blau.
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: Admin on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:32 AM CDT

Since I no longer participate on any political forums outside of Infoshop/Flag, let me share one excellent comment from the thread on Anti-Politics. This comment was made by user Yoshomon:

To run against the current anarchist publishing process I think the focus should be on crafting gorgeous books, establishing our own printing presses, publishing compelling, powerful writing, pushing our boundaries, and not settling for shit (at the most extreme - "we" should not print ugly Chomsky books anymore, ever). I am inspired by a project like Eberhardt Press. I am not inspired by what this 'book scanning', which is a small DIY version of a project that Google has undertaken (they are scanning entire university libraries). It is aesthetically unpleasing in addition to not being at odds with capital at all.

This comment really resonates with me, as it reflects my long-held goal as an anarchist and artist: to make the world a more beautiful place. One thing I really appreciate about Crimethinc and Eberhardt Press is that they publish beautiful books (and other formats). In a world with lots of ugliness, caused by the global systems of capitalism, working people deserve beautiful things created by ourselves. This is why I hate ugly crap like Z Magazine and many other left sectarian periodicals--they think that their ideas and words are so important that they don't need to pay attention to design. Why is creativity, design and art devalued by these people? Do we want to live in the dreary, uncreative world that these important people envision for us?

I don't have any problem with this book-copying project if its goal is to produce a few copies for people. (I do have issues with the shitty attitude towards the bookfair). Publishers aren't going to be hurt by a few shitty copies, although it would really help publishers if people bought their books and then shared them. There already is a system designed for mass copying--it's called the "public library," so this digitization project isn't very original. I'm totally against anybody who would attempt to make large amounts of shitty copies of current books with the idea of distributing them for free. That's just disrespectful towards publishers. It's like some anarchist shoplifting from an anarchist bookstore.

Chuck0

Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 01:47 AM CDT
A public library is not "a system for mass copying" and it is certainly not public in the sense of being run by the public. You cannot expect to find the books at the anarchist bookfair at your local public library--and you cannot expect to copy them if you do--so, however "unoriginal," I don't understand how you could criticize the usefulness here. Indeed, the usefulness is attested by the similar efforts by Google and others.

The difference between what Google does, and this DIY copying, is that in the former case, Google removes pages or sections to devalue the copy, Google chooses the books, and Google makes a profit by selling your attention to advertisers; whereas in the latter case, you get all the pages, you choose the books, and nobody sells anything.
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: mokey on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 02:53 AM CDT
again; prove that this is more than an infantile prank. make your scans public. otherwise, you're just creating (effectively) proprietary reproductions. once all the scans become public, a real discussion can begin. i know this sounds combative, but i'm feeling combative about this. drop some fuckin pdfs, jpegs, or even txts and put this discussion on an even keel. i'll make lots of copies of anything that i find interesting. i'm VERY interested in disseminating free info to anyone who wants it. i know, also, that i'm not alone. i don't know how to make nice pdfs, but i know that most anarchos want info to flow freely (and many employ BEAUTIFUL designs). i steal/buy books for the convenience of being able to sit in a waiting room or a bus stop and absorb the contents. this isn't copyright fetishism, this is simply realizing what medium works best in certain situations and utilizing different circumstances for different people. i'm trying not to be cynical about this project. i do think that it could be interesting if it abandons pure snarkiness and focuses on providing texts of books and pamphlets. in fact, i'd be more than willing to help with such a project. i have plenty of zine scans that can be OCRed and put into some kind of database that can be used for whatever the fuck anyone wants.

seriously - quit being a smartass and let's focus!
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: s on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 03:09 AM CDT
I don't know why you assume any information has been kept "proprietary." There is no claiming credit for distribution--it must be anonymized or it will be shut down--but as I said, try gigapedia.org.
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: Jaqatharina on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 02:04 AM CDT
"I'm totally against anybody who would attempt to make large amounts of shitty copies of current books with the idea of distributing them for free"

How delightful, I'm sure there are many in the publishing industries who would be all too glad to concur with your sentiment! But, pray tell, of what significance is your support of these capitalist modes of distribution, or of content congealment in general? All content will be disseminated by whatever means necessary irrespective of any content 'creators'' consent. Information will not remain enclosed, it will not remain locked down to authorized channels of distribution, and most significantly, it will not be congealed into a commodity.

Ethereal data flows, the techno-ekstasis brought about by the unbridled dissemination of information, cannot be restrained by any appeal to propertarian ethics, the sanctity of the 'work', nor the authors' wishes.

Lock your doors all you want, pretend that content has 'owners', it is no matter...the eschaton will be immanentized at 2300 hours.

In solidarity,
Jaqatharina Blau

Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: mokey on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 03:02 AM CDT
we'll have a hard time immanentizing the eschaton when we don't put on funny masks and invade straight parties. this will happen at poopdiddlepoopaplopaplopoclock o' clock o' clock o' clockclockclockcockoclock YOLD whenever the fuck it is.
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: mokey on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 03:04 AM CDT
this is what eris tells me

ddate
Today is Sweetmorn, the 62nd day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3174
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: HPWombat on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 03:02 AM CDT
"But is it a recuperating fad or a real change in the operation of capitalism? The copyright laws aren't changing, so it stands to reason that this is a temporary marketing strategy, like the "Value Menu" at McDonalds. It is also like the "Anybody but Bush" campaign, destroying more petite competition." - Thus Spoke Wombat

I wouldn't get too upset with this challenge to anarchist exchange Chuck0. When all is said and done, this device is a boon to anarchists. Imagine anarchists at a large event with this device. The more anarchistic elements may use it, the anarchist vendors may tolerate it, but leftists would spin in circles.

Good looking books will sell themselves since it is more likely to be picked up than a strung together photo-copy of a book. If it becomes too much of a competition, why would anarchists need to bring anything with them but single copies to get their table started? They can just goto the friendly copier to get their materials to distribute. I can see anarchists adjusting to this device if it became commonplace. I honestly think their resources would tap out, transportation of the device would become a drag and without controversy, the device's purpose as subversive to anarchist exchange would disappear.

Its creation was to stir the pot, but I don't see any pot being stirred except online. I think once people interact with the reality of the device, they will find themselves less outraged and probably think of ways to make this the bottom medium to ensure all people can get materials regardless of income or desire to interact with a market, while the tables could make their pamphlets more expensive and pretty for those that want a "keeper".

---
embrace the dork side
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: HPWombat on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 03:18 AM CDT
Imagine being a prison support group and finding this device at an event. Here goes a great way to challenge the integrity of the device and help prisoners.

If anyone knows its going to be around, be sure to make copies for your local books to prisoners programs

---
embrace the dork side
Digitize This Book: Disrupting the Anarchist Bookfair
Authored by: kriss on Wednesday, October 08 2008 @ 03:17 AM CDT
ChuckO's original comment which was deleted for whatever reason: http://bayimg.com/image/ealejaabg.jpg

Indeed even threads inquiring as to its deletion were themselves deleted: http://bayimg.com/image/maleaaabg.jpg

How odd!